some of our backups may be very long as we have some switches and routers with significantly large vlan tables.
we are currently running version 1.10.1
below is from the error log when this appears to occur.
Code: Select all
prod_unimus_unimus.1.xvshfhsqctw3@test.example.com | 2019-04-30 03:07:18.274 WARN 1 --- [ discovery-106] net.unimus.core.api.CoreImpl : Error during discovery of 10.109.41.5
prod_unimus_unimus.1.xvshfhsqctw3@test.example.com |
prod_unimus_unimus.1.xvshfhsqctw3@test.example.com | java.lang.IllegalStateException: Can't start StopWatch: it's already running
prod_unimus_unimus.1.xvshfhsqctw3@test.example.com | at org.springframework.util.StopWatch.start(StopWatch.java:127)
prod_unimus_unimus.1.xvshfhsqctw3@test.example.com | at org.springframework.util.StopWatch.start(StopWatch.java:116)
prod_unimus_unimus.1.xvshfhsqctw3@test.example.com | at net.unimus.core.util.metrics.JobDurationMetrics.startMeasuring(JobDurationMetrics.java:27)
prod_unimus_unimus.1.xvshfhsqctw3@test.example.com | at net.unimus.core.api.CoreImpl$DiscoveryExecutor.doRun(CoreImpl.java:348)
prod_unimus_unimus.1.xvshfhsqctw3@test.example.com | at net.unimus.core.api.CoreImpl$ErrorHandlingExecutor.run(CoreImpl.java:302)
prod_unimus_unimus.1.xvshfhsqctw3@test.example.com | at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)
prod_unimus_unimus.1.xvshfhsqctw3@test.example.com | at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
prod_unimus_unimus.1.xvshfhsqctw3@test.example.com | at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
prod_unimus_unimus.1.xvshfhsqctw3@test.example.com | at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
prod_unimus_unimus.1.xvshfhsqctw3@test.example.com | at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)