Page 1 of 1
[Fixed in 0.2.0] Initial bug report
Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2016 6:13 am
by jermudgeon
On Safari 9.1.1, the username/password configuration doesn't appear to allow entry into the second box. Didn't test it with all extensions disabled, as it worked in Chrome…
Showstopper: portal.unimus.net doesn't resolve yet (for key acquisition)
dig @8.8.8.8 portal.unimus.net
; <<>> DiG 9.8.3-P1 <<>> @8.8.8.8 portal.unimus.net
; (1 server found)
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 17552
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;portal.unimus.net. IN A
;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
unimus.net. 1752 IN SOA ns1.atris.sk. admin.atris.sk. 2016062401 1800 600 2419200 3600
Re: Initial bug report
Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2016 9:36 am
by Tomas
Will test with Safari and see whats happening.
We tested with Chrome, FF and IE/Edge, so quite strange it works on those but not on Safari...
As for the portal, its not implemented yet, on the
ToDo list 
Currently the only way to acquire keys is to sign up for the Beta using the Beta signup.
Thanks a bunch for the bug reports!
I will update this on the Safari issue as soon as I have any progress.
Re: Initial bug report
Posted: Fri Jul 15, 2016 9:06 am
by squeezypiano
Not sure if this is strictly a bug or not but the 'Created Time' column in Backups doesn't sort in proper date order.
Re: Initial bug report
Posted: Fri Jul 15, 2016 10:43 am
by Tomas
squeezypiano wrote:Not sure if this is strictly a bug or not but the 'Created Time' column in Backups doesn't sort in proper date order.
There is currently a known issue where "12:24" will be sorted as later than "2:24" (am/pm).
Is this the issue you are seeing, or is the entire sorting wrong for you?
Re: Initial bug report
Posted: Fri Jul 15, 2016 11:11 am
by squeezypiano
Tomas wrote:There is currently a known issue where "12:24" will be sorted as later than "2:24" (am/pm).
Is this the issue you are seeing, or is the entire sorting wrong for you?
I am seeing the dates sorted alphabetically on the day name rather than chronologically as here:
Fri, 15 Jul 2016, 03:00 AM text
Mon, 11 Jul 2016, 03:00 AM text
Sat, 9 Jul 2016, 03:00 AM text
Sun, 10 Jul 2016, 03:00 AM text
Thu, 14 Jul 2016, 03:00 AM text
Tue, 12 Jul 2016, 03:00 AM text
Wed, 13 Jul 2016, 03:00 AM text
Re: Initial bug report
Posted: Fri Jul 15, 2016 1:13 pm
by Tomas
squeezypiano wrote:
I am seeing the dates sorted alphabetically on the day name rather than chronologically as here:
Fri, 15 Jul 2016, 03:00 AM text
Mon, 11 Jul 2016, 03:00 AM text
Sat, 9 Jul 2016, 03:00 AM text
Sun, 10 Jul 2016, 03:00 AM text
Thu, 14 Jul 2016, 03:00 AM text
Tue, 12 Jul 2016, 03:00 AM text
Wed, 13 Jul 2016, 03:00 AM text
Gotcha, thats definatelly a bug. Added into the bug list